Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Is Hollywood Actress Julia Stiles really Mary Sue ...
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Is Hollywood Actress Julia Stiles really Mary Sue ...: "Is big boned, alleged New York Jew, Hollywood Actress Julia Stiles, really Mary Sue Peschong of Mitchell, South Dakota? Inquiring minds wis..."
Is Hollywood Actress Julia Stiles really Mary Sue Peschong?
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Who is Leonardo di Caprio really?
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Who is Leonardo di Caprio really?: "Will the farm hand Leonard Fejfar from rural South Dakota be..."
Who is Leonardo di Caprio really?
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Is Playboy Model Brittany Binger running for Unit...
Fejfar Entertainment Blog: Is Playboy Model Brittany Binger running for Unit...: "Ohio Playboy Model and Politico Brittany Binger It appears that Playboy Model, Brittany..."
Is Playboy Model Brittany Binger running for United States Senate in Ohio?
Ohio Playboy Model and Politico Brittany BingerIt appears that Playboy Model, Brittany Binger is throwing her hat into the politcal ring in Ohio. It seems that Brittany Binger is tired of the corruption and insincere politics of Congressman John Boehner. It has been reported that Boehner is immorally having two extramarital affairs at once, and, even moreso, that Boehner's extramarital affairs may have homosexual overtones. The people of Ohio, and those in Hollywood find Binger's up front, heterosexual approach to being a Playboy model to be very refreshing after the Clinton Lewinsky homosexual debacle. "The nice thing about Brittany Binger is that she is both plain and beautiful at the same moment, just like alot of other Ohio girls." Moreover, Brittany Binger is seriously contemplating dumping her boring, baseball boyfriend, who cannot switch hit, and who rarely has a batting average above .450. Reportedly, Brittany Binger is also upset that her alleged boyfried, Grady Sizemore, has posed for homosexual nude photos which have appeared on the internet. Cleveland Indians managment refuse to comment about Sizemore being suspended for bringing baseball into disgrace with his homosexual nude photos. A confidential source in the Cleveland Indian's Organization says that the real problem with Sizemore is that he keeps wanting to take his clothes off on the ball field in a sort of manic episode. On the other hand, it may be that Grady Sizemore will soon be traded to the Chicago Blackhawks baseball Organization. It seems that the Blackhawks Baseball Organization is willing to give Sizemore stock in both Frontier Communications and Verizon. Sources in the Obama Adminstration confirm that Brittany Binger is a devout Christian. As Brittany Binger might say, "I think that it is great to pose nude for Playboy. In this way, I am showing God's beauty to my audience." Billy Graham agrees. A girlhood friend of Brittany Binger confirms that she always prays before going to bed, and thus had the reputation as early as highschool for being good in bed. Also, from her appearance, it seems that Brittany Binger is part Iroquois Indian. A source in Playboy Enterprises confirms that the move to include Brittany Binger in the Playboy Organization as a Playboy Model is part of Hugh Hefner's commitment to diversity.
(C)Perpetual Copyright 2011 by Anthony J. Fejfar and Neothomism, P.C.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Thinking about Good and Evil
There seems to be 3 different approaches to considering the relationship between good and evil:
1. evil is defined as a lessening of the good
2. evil is defined as the opposite of the good
3. evil is defined a both a lessening of the good, and the opposite of the good
4. evil is defined as good, and, good is defined as evil
Now, the first three definitions have a great deal in common with each other, however, the last defintion -number 4- does not. The last definition seems to be the one used by most satanic cults. Thus, let us also consider number 4, above, using an analygis which employes syllogistic logic:
1. assume that good is defined as evil
2. assume that evil is defined as good
3. from number 1, above, derive: if good then evil
4. from number 2, above, derive: if evil then good
5. if good then evil
6. if evil then good
7 assume good exists
8 assume evil exists
9 combine 5 and 6, and derive: if evil then good and if good then evil
10 if evil then good and if good then evil
11 assume evil
12 combine 10 and 11, and derive: if evil then good, evil, therefore good
13 derive good from 12, above
14 from 10, derive, if good, then evil, good, therefore, evil
15 therefore, from evil you derive good, and from good you derive evil,
and once again from evil you derive good
16 from 15, derive, from good you derive good, and thus, good is good
17 from 15, derive, from evil you derive evil, and thus, evil is evil
18 thus, where evil is defined as good, and, good is defined as evil,
logically, it is true that good is good, and, evil is evil
19 from 18, above, derive: good is good and evil is evil
1. evil is defined as a lessening of the good
2. evil is defined as the opposite of the good
3. evil is defined a both a lessening of the good, and the opposite of the good
4. evil is defined as good, and, good is defined as evil
Now, the first three definitions have a great deal in common with each other, however, the last defintion -number 4- does not. The last definition seems to be the one used by most satanic cults. Thus, let us also consider number 4, above, using an analygis which employes syllogistic logic:
1. assume that good is defined as evil
2. assume that evil is defined as good
3. from number 1, above, derive: if good then evil
4. from number 2, above, derive: if evil then good
5. if good then evil
6. if evil then good
7 assume good exists
8 assume evil exists
9 combine 5 and 6, and derive: if evil then good and if good then evil
10 if evil then good and if good then evil
11 assume evil
12 combine 10 and 11, and derive: if evil then good, evil, therefore good
13 derive good from 12, above
14 from 10, derive, if good, then evil, good, therefore, evil
15 therefore, from evil you derive good, and from good you derive evil,
and once again from evil you derive good
16 from 15, derive, from good you derive good, and thus, good is good
17 from 15, derive, from evil you derive evil, and thus, evil is evil
18 thus, where evil is defined as good, and, good is defined as evil,
logically, it is true that good is good, and, evil is evil
19 from 18, above, derive: good is good and evil is evil
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

